Canada-U.S. Commons committee exploring latest cross-border pipeline flashpoint
Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., speaks as Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., listens at left during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, March 16, 2021. (Kevin Dietsch/AP)
WASHINGTON -- The latest pipeline dispute between Canada and the United States is back on the agenda in Ottawa.
Enbridge vice-president Vern Yu is scheduled to appear Tuesday before a special House of Commons committee exploring Canada-U.S. ties.
Enbridge owns and operates Line 5, a vital cross-border energy link that Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has vowed to shut down.
Whitmer is convinced the dual pipeline, which runs beneath the Straits of Mackinac that connect Lake Michigan and Lake Huron, poses too severe a threat to the health of the Great Lakes.
Yu, head of the Calgary company's liquid-pipeline division, has called Whitmer's concerns baseless and says Line 5 remains safe.
Michigan has refused to concede that the state's own experts have concluded there are no clear alternatives to the pipeline, he wrote to the governor in a letter earlier this year.
The state “fails to acknowledge that Line 5 enables the safe transport of fuel essential to heat homes and provides energy to Michigan, neighbouring U.S. states and Canada's two largest provinces,” Yu wrote.
“It also fails to account for the significant adverse social and economic impacts that will result from closure.”
Line 5 has emerged as the newest flashpoint in Canada-U.S. relations just two months after President Joe Biden cancelled the Keystone XL expansion project.
Also testifying today are Maryscott Greenwood of the Canadian American Business Council and Mark Agnew and Aaron Henry of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce.
Prepared remarks by Agnew and Henry indicate the chamber is taking a hard line as part of a concerted “Team Canada” approach to opposing Michigan's efforts to shut down the line.
“Revoking the easement and shutting down Line 5 will create significant repercussions for Canada and the U.S. economies,” Henry, the chamber's senior director of natural resources, says in his opening statement.
Cutting off the pipeline, which moves some 540,000 barrels of fossil fuels a day through Michigan, would cost $65 billion in direct revenue and $28 billion of indirect revenue in annual trade.
It delivers more than half the state's propane demand, supports 29,000 jobs in Sarnia, Ont., alone, and would require 800 rail cars or 2,000 trucks a day to replace its capacity, the statement adds.
“There is no alternative to Line 5, simply because the capacity to absorb the products moved through Line 5 does not exist.”
Andrew Leach, an economist and business professor at the University of Alberta who specializes in the energy sector, said the Line 5 dispute is shaping up as a major sticking point between Canada and the United States.
Keystone XL, the TC Energy expansion project that Biden shut down on his first day in the White House, proved a bilateral irritant throughout President Barack Obama's two terms as president.
Biden's decision prompted a fierce reaction from Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, who has promised to take “every legal recourse” in hopes of recouping the province's multibillion-dollar investment.
Whitmer, meanwhile, is a close ally of Biden who was on his original list of potential running mates before he made her a vice-chair of the Democratic National Committee.
“The combination of Gov. Whitmer's connection to the Biden administration, the probably ill-advised opening gambits from Alberta and to some degree Canada, digging their heels in as they did, probably made it more likely that this becomes the next flashpoint,” Leach said.
The difference between Keystone XL and Line 5, he added, is that the latter is a pre-existing pipeline that has been demonstrating its importance to both countries for nearly 60 years.
“You don't need to do hypotheticals about this,” Leach said. “It's very clear.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 16, 2021